So what was in those "Enclosed Documents"? And
did they provided new or better evidence about Iraq's link to 9/11? I guess not, because a year later (in
September of 2003):
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/breaking_news/v-pfriendly/story/118375p-106713c.html
WASHINGTON - President Bush said Wednesday there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved
in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — disputing an impression that critics say the
administration tried to foster to justify the war against Iraq.
“There's no question that Saddam Hussein had al-Qaida ties,” the president said. But he also said,
"“We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th.”
After studying economics for 6 years, which availed me of the merits of free markets, I have circled back to the conclusion that, overall, Democrats will benefit most people in the long run far more than Republicans. I chronicle my observations in this blog.
Learn Econ on Wikipedia|Blog Archive
Tuesday, September 21, 2004
Dems on Iraq: What Kerry Voted For and What Bush Did, part 2
Labels:
2004 Election,
Bush,
Hilary Clinton,
Iraq,
John Kerry
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment